From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. McDaniel

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Feb 2, 2016
499 Mich. 852 (Mich. 2016)

Opinion

Docket No. 151792. COA No. 326070.

02-02-2016

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Marquis Shantae McDANIEL, Defendant–Appellant.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 22, 2015 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Kent Circuit Court to determine whether the court would have imposed a materially different sentence under the sentencing procedure described in People v. Lockridge, 498 Mich. 358, 870 N.W.2d 502 (2015). On remand, the trial court shall follow the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion. If the trial court determines that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If, however, the trial court determines that it would not have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it shall resentence the defendant.


Summaries of

People v. McDaniel

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Feb 2, 2016
499 Mich. 852 (Mich. 2016)
Case details for

People v. McDaniel

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Marquis Shantae…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Feb 2, 2016

Citations

499 Mich. 852 (Mich. 2016)
873 N.W.2d 576

Citing Cases

McDaniel v. Gidley

On remand, the trial judge was to determine whether he would have imposed a materially different sentence but…