From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. McDaniel

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Feb 2, 2016
SC: 151792 (Mich. Feb. 2, 2016)

Opinion

SC: 151792

02-02-2016

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MARQUIS SHANTAE McDANIEL, Defendant-Appellant.


Order

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, Justices COA: 326070
Kent CC: 11-007165-FH

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 22, 2015 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Kent Circuit Court to determine whether the court would have imposed a materially different sentence under the sentencing procedure described in People v Lockridge, 498 Mich 358 (2015). On remand, the trial court shall follow the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion. If the trial court determines that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If, however, the trial court determines that it would not have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it shall resentence the defendant.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 2, 2016

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

People v. McDaniel

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Feb 2, 2016
SC: 151792 (Mich. Feb. 2, 2016)
Case details for

People v. McDaniel

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MARQUIS SHANTAE…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Feb 2, 2016

Citations

SC: 151792 (Mich. Feb. 2, 2016)