From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. McCaskill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 18, 1986
117 A.D.2d 757 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

February 18, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dufficy, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

The record reflects certain inconsistencies between the accounts given by two boys who testified that the defendant pointed a gun at them and threatened them, as well as between each of those accounts and the testimony of the arresting officer. The arresting officer's testimony also reflects certain internal inconsistencies. However, all of those inconsistencies did not undermine the credibility of the witnesses to such a degree as to render their testimony insufficient proof of the defendant's guilt (see, People v. Fuller, 50 N.Y.2d 628, 635). The officer's testimony that, immediately after the boys informed him of the incident, he approached the defendant, who was holding a gun, supports the boys' account that it was the defendant, and not his companion, who held the gun. Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to support the conviction (see, People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 621; Penal Law § 160.10; § 265.02). Mollen, P.J., Gibbons, Thompson and Brown, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. McCaskill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 18, 1986
117 A.D.2d 757 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

People v. McCaskill

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHARLES McCASKILL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 18, 1986

Citations

117 A.D.2d 757 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

People v. Padmore

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we…

People v. Martinez

Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the People, a rational trier of fact could have found…