From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. McCargo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 13, 1979
67 A.D.2d 955 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Opinion

February 13, 1979


Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered February 15, 1978, convicting him of burglary in the third degree and petit larceny, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. Prior to the selection of the second alternate juror the court stated that defense counsel had requested that it charge that no unfavorable inference could be drawn against the defendant if he failed to take the witness stand on his own behalf. Although no objection or exception was taken to the statement it was improper for the court to tell the jury that such a request had been made by the defendant. (See People v. McLucas, 15 N.Y.2d 167; People v. Muir, 51 A.D.2d 859; People v. Strawder, 54 A.D.2d 743.) However, the court did not repeat the error when it charged the jury at the end of the case, so that the jury's attention was not directed to that isolated remark (cf. People v. Newman, 46 N.Y.2d 126). Here the proof of guilt was so overwhelming that the error should be disregarded (see People v. Strawder, supra). We have carefully considered the defendant's other allegations of error and, so far as they were objected to, they lack merit. With regard to the unobjected errors the interest of justice does not require our intervention. O'Connor, J.P., Rabin, Gulotta and Shapiro, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. McCargo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 13, 1979
67 A.D.2d 955 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)
Case details for

People v. McCargo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN H. McCARGO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 13, 1979

Citations

67 A.D.2d 955 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Citing Cases

People v. Sharp

' The District Attorney says he proved it beyond all doubt." The court improperly informed the jury that it…

People v. Knowell

CPL 300.10 (subd 2) has not entirely eliminated the requirement that the court marshal the evidence; it must…