From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. McCain

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 5, 1999
260 A.D.2d 407 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

April 5, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Martin, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The right of a defendant to withdraw a previously-entered plea of guilty rests within the sound discretion of the sentencing court (see, CPL 220.60; People v. Ellerbe, 237 A.D.2d 299). The defendant knowingly and voluntarily pleaded guilty in the presence of counsel after the court had advised him of the consequences of his plea during the plea allocution (see, People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9). The court did not err in imposing sentence upon the defendant's failure to successfully complete the drug treatment program (see, People v. Cass, 228 A.D.2d 448; People v. Bailey, 215 A.D.2d 769).

The defendant's remaining contention was not raised in his application to withdraw his plea and therefore is not preserved for appellate review (see, People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 665; People v. Griffin, 186 A.D.2d 820).

Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. McCain

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 5, 1999
260 A.D.2d 407 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. McCain

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANTHONY McCAIN, True…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 5, 1999

Citations

260 A.D.2d 407 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
686 N.Y.S.2d 711

Citing Cases

People v. Lozado

Contrary to the People's contention, the record is insufficient to demonstrate that the defendant knowingly…

People v. Blackford

In any event, his contentions are without merit. The Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in…