From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Maye

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 28, 1995
214 A.D.2d 1026 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

April 28, 1995

Appeal from the Niagara County Court, DiFlorio, J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Green, Wesley, Doerr and Balio, JJ.


Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed and matter remitted to Niagara County Court for sentencing in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant's conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree (Penal Law § 220.06) is not supported by legally sufficient evidence that defendant had the requisite knowledge of the weight of the controlled substance (see, People v Ryan, 82 N.Y.2d 497; see also, People v Maye, 206 A.D.2d 846). Defendant's conviction must be reduced to criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, the sentence imposed thereon vacated, and the matter remitted to Niagara County Court for sentencing on that conviction (see, People v Lawrence, 204 A.D.2d 969, lv granted 84 N.Y.2d 937; see also, People v Maye, supra).


Summaries of

People v. Maye

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 28, 1995
214 A.D.2d 1026 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Maye

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROSEMARY MAYE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 28, 1995

Citations

214 A.D.2d 1026 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
627 N.Y.S.2d 594