From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Maxwell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 11, 2005
22 A.D.3d 607 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2001-10506.

October 11, 2005.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Smith, J.), rendered October 24, 2001, convicting him of reckless endangerment in the second degree (two counts), reckless driving, speeding, and unauthorized use of a vehicle in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Barry W. Warhit, White Plains, N.Y., for appellant, and appellant pro se.

Jeanine Pirro, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Richard Longworth Hecht, Melissa A. Smith, Valerie A. Livingston, and Michael J. Ashraf of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Adams, J.P., Mastro, Lifson and Lunn, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in sentencing the defendant as a persistent felony offender. The court's conclusion, as set forth in the record, that the nature of the defendant's criminal conduct, his history, and his character warranted extended incarceration and lifetime supervision is amply supported by the record ( see People v. Thomas, 255 AD2d 468; Penal Law § 70.10; CPL 400.20). The defendant's contention that the court sentenced him as a persistent felony offender out of vindictiveness because he refused to accept a particular plea offer is without merit ( see People v. Thomas, supra).

The defendant's remaining contentions raised in his supplemental pro se brief are unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05) and, in any event, are without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Maxwell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 11, 2005
22 A.D.3d 607 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

People v. Maxwell

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DAVID MAXWELL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 11, 2005

Citations

22 A.D.3d 607 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 7562
802 N.Y.S.2d 505

Citing Cases

People v. Dixon

The record, as a whole, demonstrates that the defendant was afforded the effective assistance of counsel (…

People v. Bazemore

ORDERED that the resentence is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing…