From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Mateo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 24, 1990
168 A.D.2d 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

December 24, 1990

Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Belfi, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Upon our review of the minutes of the plea proceedings, we conclude that the defendant's plea was knowing and voluntary and that the allocution was factually sufficient (see, People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 666). We further find that, contrary to the defendant's contentions on appeal, the defense of agency was not implicated in his factual recitation. Accordingly, there was no duty for the court to make any further inquiries in order to ensure that the defendant's plea was knowing and voluntary (see, People v. Gaither, 153 A.D.2d 587). Thompson, J.P., Brown, Balletta, Miller and O'Brien, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Mateo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 24, 1990
168 A.D.2d 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Mateo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSE MATEO, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 24, 1990

Citations

168 A.D.2d 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
563 N.Y.S.2d 471

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

Memorandum: Defendant's recitation of the facts did not cast significant doubt upon his guilt of criminal…