From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Martinez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 21, 2006
27 A.D.3d 665 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

1998-04410.

March 21, 2006.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Spires, J.), rendered April 16, 1998, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Tonya Plank of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and Frances Impellizzeri of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Rivera and Dillon, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's arguments regarding alleged prosecutorial misconduct during summation are without merit. The challenged remarks constituted fair comment on the evidence ( see People v. Ashwal, 39 NY2d 105), were responsive to arguments presented in the defense counsel's summation ( see People v. Galloway, 54 NY2d 396; People v. Baker, 251 AD2d 592), or were harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt ( see People v. Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230).


Summaries of

People v. Martinez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 21, 2006
27 A.D.3d 665 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

People v. Martinez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDWARD MARTINEZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 21, 2006

Citations

27 A.D.3d 665 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 2219
810 N.Y.S.2d 686

Citing Cases

State of N.Y. v. Prince

mely fashion, requested curative instructions, and then, at the conclusion of the summation, moved for a…

People v. Baston

The defendant's contention that the prosecutor's summation statements deprived him of a fair trial is also…