From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Martinez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 23, 2004
5 A.D.3d 278 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

3194.

Decided March 23, 2004.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Felice Shea, J.), rendered July 2, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third and fourth degrees, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 7½ to 15 years, unanimously affirmed.

Susan Axelrod, for Respondent.

Lisa Lewis, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: Tom, J.P., Andrias, Ellerin, Gonzalez, JJ.


The challenged portions of the People's summation generally constituted fair comment on the evidence, and reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom, in response to defense arguments, and the summation did not deprive defendant of a fair trial ( see People v. Overlee, 236 A.D.2d 133, lv denied 91 N.Y.2d 976; People v. D'Alessandro, 184 A.D.2d 114, 118-119, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 884). The People were entitled to comment on the credibility of defendant's testimony and on the lack of evidentiary support for his claims. To the extent that the summation contained any improprieties, the court's curative actions, along with its final jury instructions, prevented any prejudice. The court clearly instructed the jury that the burden of proof remained on the People and did not shift to defendant.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Martinez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 23, 2004
5 A.D.3d 278 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Martinez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RAFAEL MARTINEZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 23, 2004

Citations

5 A.D.3d 278 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
774 N.Y.S.2d 680

Citing Cases

People v. Farino

05; People v. Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19), and we decline to reach them in the exercise of our interest of justice…

People v. Caldarola

In any event, the contention is without merit, as the indictment charged more than the People were required…