From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Martin, Mitchell, Hazel

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 18, 1965
207 N.E.2d 197 (N.Y. 1965)

Opinion

Argued February 11, 1965

Decided March 18, 1965

Appeal from the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, JOHN DALY, J.

Robert L. Carter and Joan Franklin for appellants. William Cahn, District Attorney ( Henry P. De Vine and Martin I. Silberg of counsel), for respondent.


Judgments affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Judges VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN. Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE and FULD dissent and vote to reverse and to dismiss the information upon the ground that the evidence was insufficient to warrant the conviction of defendants of the crime of disorderly conduct in violation of subdivisions 1 and 2 of section 722 of the Penal Law. ( People v. Perry, 265 N.Y. 362; People v. Chesnick, 302 N.Y. 58; People v. Carcel, 3 N.Y.2d 327.)


Summaries of

People v. Martin, Mitchell, Hazel

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 18, 1965
207 N.E.2d 197 (N.Y. 1965)
Case details for

People v. Martin, Mitchell, Hazel

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FRANK L. MARTIN…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 18, 1965

Citations

207 N.E.2d 197 (N.Y. 1965)
207 N.E.2d 197
259 N.Y.S.2d 152

Citing Cases

People v. Street

The State may, under its police powers, proscribe many forms of conduct which threaten the peace, security or…

United States v. Jones

See People v. Penn, 16 N.Y.2d 581, 260 N.Y.S.2d 847, 208 N.E.2d 789 (1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 969, 86…