From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Marte-Tejada

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Mar 12, 2020
66 Misc. 3d 153 (N.Y. App. Term 2020)

Opinion

19-320

03-12-2020

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Johansel MARTE-TEJADA, Defendant-Appellant.


Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (Angela J. Badamo, J.), rendered January 23, 2019, reversed, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, accusatory instrument dismissed, and surcharge, if paid, remitted.

The People, in the exercise of their broad prosecutorial discretion, have agreed that the accusatory instrument should be dismissed under the particular circumstances of the case and in light of recent legislation amending Penal Law § 265.01 to effectively decriminalize the simple possession of gravity knives, notwithstanding that this law does not apply retroactively (see People v. Caviness , 176 AD3d 522 [2019], lv denied 34 NY3d 1076 [2019] ). We agree, and we do not reach any other issues.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


Summaries of

People v. Marte-Tejada

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Mar 12, 2020
66 Misc. 3d 153 (N.Y. App. Term 2020)
Case details for

People v. Marte-Tejada

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Johansel Marte-Tejada…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT

Date published: Mar 12, 2020

Citations

66 Misc. 3d 153 (N.Y. App. Term 2020)
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 50347
125 N.Y.S.3d 831

Citing Cases

People v. Bullock

Defendant argues that the change in the law should be applied retroactively to his case since the change…

People v. Bullock

Defendant argues that the change in the law should be applied retroactively to his case since the change…