From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Marria

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 23, 1998
247 A.D.2d 635 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

February 23, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Egitto, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Because the defendant pleaded guilty with full knowledge of the sentence he was to receive, he has no cause to complain on appeal that his sentence is harsh or excessive ( see, People v. Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816). In any event, the sentence is neither harsh nor excessive ( see, People v. Farrar, 52 N.Y.2d 302).

The arguments raised in the defendant's pro se brief involve matters which are dehors the record, and which may not be reviewed on direct appeal from the judgment of conviction ( see, People v. Neal, 205 A.D.2d 711).

Miller, J.P., Ritter, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Marria

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 23, 1998
247 A.D.2d 635 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Marria

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RASHAAD MARRIA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 23, 1998

Citations

247 A.D.2d 635 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
669 N.Y.S.2d 241