From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Marmol

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 21, 2006
27 A.D.3d 1204 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2005-02792.

Decided March 21, 2006.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hanophy, J.), imposed March 16, 2005, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano and William Milaccio of counsel; Lindsey Frischer on the memorandum), for respondent.

Before: A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J., THOMAS A. ADAMS, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, ROBERT A. SPOLZINO, MARK C. DILLON, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed. No opinion.

PRUDENTI, P.J., ADAMS, KRAUSMAN, SPOLZINO and DILLON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Marmol

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 21, 2006
27 A.D.3d 1204 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

People v. Marmol

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. ERNESTO MARMOL, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 21, 2006

Citations

27 A.D.3d 1204 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 2217