Opinion
February 27, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Koch, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the introduction of rebuttal testimony was improper was unpreserved for appellate review because no objection to this evidence was made (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Udzinski, 146 A.D.2d 245). In any event, the testimony was not collateral because it went to refute the testimony of the defense witnesses (see, People v. Harris, 57 N.Y.2d 335, 345, cert denied 460 U.S. 1047).
The defendant's challenges to two of the People's summation comments were unpreserved for appellate review and in any event do not warrant reversal (see, People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230, 241-242). Balletta, J.P., Thompson, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.