From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Malatesta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 15, 1991
172 A.D.2d 692 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

April 15, 1991

Appeal from the County Court, Suffolk County (Mazzei, J.).


Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant contends that the County Court erred by not affording him an opportunity to withdraw his pleas of guilty before imposing sentences higher than those originally negotiated in the plea agreement. Although that is the usual rule (see, Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257), it does not apply in the instant case. Taken as a whole, the record indicates the clear intent of the court to condition the promised sentences upon the defendant's appearance on the date scheduled for sentencing. Because defendant failed to appear on the scheduled date, the court was no longer bound by its promise and was free to impose higher sentences (see, People v. Parker, 172 A.D.2d 697 [decided herewith]; People v. Gamble, 111 A.D.2d 869; People v. McDaniels, 111 A.D.2d 876). Thompson, J.P., Kunzeman, Eiber, Rosenblatt and Ritter, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Malatesta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 15, 1991
172 A.D.2d 692 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Malatesta

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANTHONY MALATESTA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 15, 1991

Citations

172 A.D.2d 692 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Citing Cases

People v. Gianfrate

Additionally, defendant argues that her inadvertent failure to appear at the sentencing does not justify…

People v. Evans

While several of the reasons offered by the court at resentencing to support imposition of an enhanced…