From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Maiello

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 15, 2006
32 A.D.3d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2005-09215.

August 15, 2006.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Grosso, J.), dated July 18, 2005, which, pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.

Lawrence V. Carra´, Mineola, N.Y., for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano and Johnnette Traill of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Schmidt, J.P., Crane, Krausman, Skelos and Lunn, JJ


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant did not demonstrate circumstances which would warrant a departure from the presumptive level three risk level assigned to him under the risk assessment instrument ( see People v Guaman, 8 AD3d 545). The defendant's evidence, while demonstrating that he had made efforts toward rehabilitation and treatment, was conclusory and unsubstantiated. Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in designating the defendant a level three sex offender.


Summaries of

People v. Maiello

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 15, 2006
32 A.D.3d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

People v. Maiello

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RICHARD J. MAIELLO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 15, 2006

Citations

32 A.D.3d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 6226
819 N.Y.S.2d 483

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

The defendant failed to show by clear and convincing evidence that special circumstances existed warranting a…

People v. William Johnson

The victim's sworn statements, offered by the People at the SORA hearing, constituted "reliable hearsay"…