From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Maddox

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 26, 1984
105 A.D.2d 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

November 26, 1984

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldstein, J.).


Sentence affirmed.

Although the trial court, during the allocution prior to the defendant's entry of the plea of guilty upon which the predicate felony conviction was rendered, did not expressly extract a waiver of his privilege against self incrimination, we agree that the plea was voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently entered since the record demonstrated, inter alia, that defendant was represented by counsel; that he was advised by the Trial Judge that by pleading guilty he was giving up his rights to a trial by jury and to confront the witnesses against him; that he stated that he was pleading freely, without coercion; that he stated he had discussed his plea with his attorney; that he acknowledged the facts underlying his commission of the crime; and that he rejected the trial court's offer at sentencing to withdraw his plea and proceed to trial. Under the circumstances, it cannot be said that the defendant's prior guilty plea was constitutionally defective (see People v Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9). Titone, J.P., Lazer, Mangano and Niehoff, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Maddox

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 26, 1984
105 A.D.2d 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

People v. Maddox

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RAYNARD MADDOX…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 26, 1984

Citations

105 A.D.2d 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

People v. Tavares

nt counsel in exchange for the promise of a favorable sentence ( see People v. Fiumefreddo, 82 N.Y.2d 536,…