Opinion
Submitted April 1, 1968
Decided April 4, 1968
Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon the following question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Whether appellant's motion to suppress evidence should have been granted because the evidence was procured through an unlawful search and seizure in violation of his rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States. The Court of Appeals held that there was no denial of any constitutional right of defendant.