From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lynch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 26, 1998
254 A.D.2d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

October 26, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Blumenfeld, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the police had reasonable suspicion to detain him for a showup identification by the complainant in close physical and temporal proximity to the crime ( see, People v. Duuvon, 77 N.Y.2d 541; People v. Johnson, 244 A.D.2d 573). Moreover, suppression of the physical evidence found upon the defendant's person was properly denied, as it was seized pursuant to a lawful arrest, after the complainant identified the defendant ( see, People v. Evans, 43 N.Y.2d 160).

Joy, J. P., Friedmann, Krausman and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Lynch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 26, 1998
254 A.D.2d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Lynch

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. TYRONE LYNCH, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 26, 1998

Citations

254 A.D.2d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
680 N.Y.S.2d 112

Citing Cases

People v. Tavarez

The defendant's contention that the traffic stop was pretexutal is without merit. The stop was based upon a…

People v. Klimas

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. Contrary to the defendant's contention, the police had reasonable…