From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Luna

Supreme Court of Colorado
Jul 6, 1982
648 P.2d 624 (Colo. 1982)

Summary

distinguishing between the district court's appellate and trial authority

Summary of this case from Bovard v. People

Opinion

No. 82SA74

Decided July 6, 1982. Rehearing denied August 3, 1982.

Appeal from the District Court of Adams County, Honorable Harlan R. Bockman, Judge.

Paul Q. Beacom, District Attorney, Steven Bernard, Deputy District Attorney, Kathryn J. Aragon, Deputy District Attorney, for plaintiff-appellant.

No Appearance for defendant-appellee.

En Banc.


The People seek review by appeal rather than by certiorari of the district court's dismissal of their appeal of a ruling of the county court. For the reasons stated below, we dismiss the appeal filed in this court.

A Thornton police officer served the appellee, Luna, a summons and complaint charging him with "Driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor and/or drug." The Adams County Court dismissed the complaint, ruling that the above quoted charge did not include the words "a vehicle" after the word "driving," and therefore the complaint was defective.

The People appealed this ruling to the Adams County District Court pursuant to section 13-6-310, C.R.S. 1973, and Crim. P. 37. The district court dismissed the appeal, holding that there was no final judgment from which an appeal could be taken.

The People appeal this ruling of dismissal under the apparent authority of section 16-12-102, C.R.S. 1973 (Repl. Vol. 8). This statute provides that "The prosecution may appeal any decision of the trial court in a criminal case upon any question of law."

We can do no better than to once again state the holding of People v. Gonzales, Jr., 198 Colo. 546, 603 P.2d 139 (1979), for it is dispositive of the case before us:

"The district court is a court of dual jurisdiction, sitting both as a trial court and an appellate court. Colo. Const. Art. VI, Sec. 9; section 13-6-310, C.R.S. 1973. In the case before us, the district court was clearly sitting in its appellate capacity.

"The only mechanism for review of a district court's determination on appeal from the county court is by certiorari to this court as specified in section 13-6-310(4), C.R.S. 1973, which directs that: `Further appeal to the supreme court from a determination of the district court or the superior court in a matter appealed to such court from the county court may be made only upon writ of certiorari issued in the discretion of the supreme court. . . .'"

The People improperly appealed this case, and therefore the appeal is dismissed.


Summaries of

People v. Luna

Supreme Court of Colorado
Jul 6, 1982
648 P.2d 624 (Colo. 1982)

distinguishing between the district court's appellate and trial authority

Summary of this case from Bovard v. People
Case details for

People v. Luna

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ralph L…

Court:Supreme Court of Colorado

Date published: Jul 6, 1982

Citations

648 P.2d 624 (Colo. 1982)

Citing Cases

Bovard v. People

Accordingly, we characterized the district court as a court of dual jurisdiction having the authority to…