From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Loyd

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 28, 1993
193 A.D.2d 1062 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

May 28, 1993

Appeal from the Erie County Court, D'Amico, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Green, Lawton, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By failing to object to the court's charge, defendant failed to preserve for review her present argument that the court's charge on justification was erroneous (see, CPL 470.05; People v Williams, 176 A.D.2d 1209, lv denied 79 N.Y.2d 833). In any event, the charge adequately apprised the jury of the relevant concepts. We further conclude that the court's charge did not allow the jury to consider a theory not charged in the indictment (cf., People v Grega, 72 N.Y.2d 489). Finally, we conclude that the People presented evidence sufficient to disprove defendant's justification defense beyond a reasonable doubt. The evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the People (People v Kennedy, 47 N.Y.2d 196, 203), demonstrated that the victim was unarmed and was fleeing the scene at the time he was stabbed by defendant.


Summaries of

People v. Loyd

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 28, 1993
193 A.D.2d 1062 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Loyd

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DIANE LOYD, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 28, 1993

Citations

193 A.D.2d 1062 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
600 N.Y.S.2d 671

Citing Cases

People v. Ponder

Also unpreserved for our review is defendant's contention that the court erred in ordering and admitting in…

People v. Mccullough

Contrary to defendant's contention, Supreme Court did not err in refusing to include the names and locations…