Opinion
No. 113510.
September 28, 1999.
On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal from the July 28, 1998 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
The Court of Appeals lacked the authority to grant the defendant's delayed application for leave to appeal. MCR 7.205(F)(3). The defendant may file a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to MCR Chapter 6.500 and argue that his first appellate attorney's neglect of the appeal of right establishes the required "good cause" for failing to raise his current appellate issues in that appeal of right. See MCR 6.508(D)(3)(a) and People v Reed, 449 Mich. 375 (1995).
Court of Appeals No. 21383.