From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Loprete

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 21, 1964
22 A.D.2d 926 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Opinion

December 21, 1964


Motion by the District Attorney of Queens County: (a) to have this court hold in abeyance the pending appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County rendered February 15, 1963 after a jury trial, convicting him of robbery and other crimes; and (b) to remit the action to the trial court for a separate trial de novo upon the issue of the voluntariness of defendant's confession. This motion is made necessary because of the recent decision of the Supreme Court of the United States ( Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368). It appears that the issue as to the voluntariness of defendant's confession was raised at the trial and submitted to the jury. Accordingly, the motion is granted and the action is remitted to the Criminal Term, Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. A separate trial should be accorded promptly to the defendant upon the issue of the voluntariness of his confession. Such trial should be held de novo before the court alone, without a jury. At the conclusion of the trial, the Justice presiding shall render promptly his decision setting forth specifically his findings upon the issue. The decision should be based exclusively on the evidence adduced upon such trial. The trial should also be conducted in accordance with such further or different procedures and requirements as may be prescribed by the Court of Appeals of this State in any decision rendered by it prior to the trial court's decision upon the issue of voluntariness. Within 20 days after the trial court's decision upon the issue of voluntariness, a supplemental record, consisting of the typewritten or printed transcript of the stenographic minutes of the separate trial and of the court's decision and findings, should be filed and served by the District Attorney. Within 20 days thereafter the defendant shall serve and file his typewritten or printed brief or supplemental brief; and within 30 days thereafter the District Attorney shall serve and file his brief or supplemental brief. [If defendant's brief or supplemental brief be typewritten, six copies are required to be filed and one copy served.] The appeal is directed to be placed on the calendar for the April Term, commencing March 29, 1965. Kleinfeld, Acting P.J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Loprete

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 21, 1964
22 A.D.2d 926 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)
Case details for

People v. Loprete

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FRANK LOPRETE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 21, 1964

Citations

22 A.D.2d 926 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Citing Cases

People v. Virga

The vital question for answer, based on the oral argument of respective counsel and on their briefs, the…

People v. Loprete

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered February 15, 1963…