Opinion
July 31, 1989
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Curci, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The evidence adduced at trial fails to support the asserted defense that the defendant was working for the police when he sold cocaine to undercover officers. Accordingly, the court's refusal to charge the jury on the defense of agency was not error (see, People v Watts, 57 N.Y.2d 299, 301).
Upon our review of the trial record, we also reject the defendant's contention that he was deprived of a fair trial by the conduct of the Trial Judge and of the prosecutor. The court's criticism of counsel was evenhanded, defense counsel was afforded extensive leeway in presenting evidence, and the court gave many curative instructions to the jury designed to prevent any unfairness or undue prejudice. These instructions in many instances not only prevented unfairness but were beneficial to the defendant.
We are further unpersuaded by the defendant's argument in his pro se brief that his sentence was unduly harsh and excessive. His plea for leniency on the ground that he is a drug addict and a low-level street dealer selling drugs only to support his own habit is belied by his conviction in this case for selling a total of more than two pounds of cocaine.
We have reviewed the defendant's remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J.P., Thompson, Brown and Sullivan, JJ., concur.