From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Long

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 2, 1996
224 A.D.2d 949 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

February 2, 1996

Appeal from the Monroe County Court, Marks, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Fallon, Callahan, Doerr and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that his conviction of burglary in the third degree is against the weight of the evidence because the People failed to establish that he knowingly entered the gas station unlawfully or that he entered with the contemporaneous intent to commit a crime therein (see, People v. Graves, 76 N.Y.2d 16; People v. Gaines, 74 N.Y.2d 358, 362). We disagree. The jury, faced with conflicting testimony, resolved the issue of credibility and rejected defendant's claim (see, People v. Christian [appeal No. 1], 139 A.D.2d 896, lv denied 71 N.Y.2d 1024). Upon weighing the relative probative force of the conflicting testimony, we conclude that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495). The sentence imposed is neither unduly harsh nor severe (see, CPL 470.15 [b]).


Summaries of

People v. Long

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 2, 1996
224 A.D.2d 949 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Long

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ALFRED LONG, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 2, 1996

Citations

224 A.D.2d 949 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
638 N.Y.S.2d 369

Citing Cases

People v. Salgado

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the conviction of burglary in the first…

People v. Ritchie Campbell

We disagree. An eyewitness testified that, seconds before the shooting, defendant threatened to "blow [the…