From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. London

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 9, 1998
248 A.D.2d 554 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

March 9, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Kuffner, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

There is no merit to the defendant's contention that a new trial is required because the trial court improperly charged the jury regarding consciousness of guilt evidence. The charge, when viewed in its entirety, conveyed the proper standard of law and did not confuse or mislead the jury ( see, Cupp v. Naughten, 414 U.S. 141, 146-147; People v. Fields, 87 N.Y.2d 821, 823; People v. Pol, 226 A.D.2d 320; see also, People v. Harrison, 151 A.D.2d 501).

Santucci, J. P., Joy, Friedmann and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. London

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 9, 1998
248 A.D.2d 554 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. London

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BENNY LONDON, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 9, 1998

Citations

248 A.D.2d 554 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
669 N.Y.S.2d 903

Citing Cases

People v. Solimini

Ordered that the judgment, as amended, is affirmed. "Contrary to the defendant's contention, there was a…

People v. Brown

05[2]; People v. Arriaga, 77 A.D.3d at 847, 909 N.Y.S.2d 379) and, in any event, without merit. The County…