From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lockett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 15, 1986
122 A.D.2d 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

August 15, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Friedmann, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

The defendant's claim that certain physical evidence seized by the police after his arrest should have been suppressed is without merit (cf. People v Green, 35 N.Y.2d 193; People v Harris, 48 N.Y.2d 208; People v Rosen, 112 A.D.2d 253).

Moreover, the defendant's contention that his sentence is excessive is moot. The defendant, who was entitled to credit for time already served on the pending indictment, has already served the maximum time on the sentence imposed. In any event, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Pena, 50 N.Y.2d 400, 409-410, cert denied 449 U.S. 1087). Lawrence, J.P., Eiber, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Lockett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 15, 1986
122 A.D.2d 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

People v. Lockett

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SAMUEL LOCKETT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 15, 1986

Citations

122 A.D.2d 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

People v. Nicholson

The defendant's challenge to the voluntariness of his pleas is unpreserved for appellate review because he…