In re People ex rel. L.L.

23 Citing cases

  1. People v. M.M. (In re M.V.)

    432 P.3d 628 (Colo. App. 2018)   Cited 14 times

    ¶ 26 To adhere to ICWA's notice provisions, the Department must directly notify the tribe by registered mail with return receipt requested of the pending child custody proceeding and its right to intervene. People in Interest of L.L. , 2017 COA 38, ¶¶ 34-35, 395 P.3d 1209. The Department should try to provide sufficient information to the tribe for it to determine whether the child is a member or eligible for membership.

  2. People v. K.M. (In re L.M.)

    433 P.3d 114 (Colo. App. 2018)   Cited 12 times

    ¶ 67 The BIA has repealed the 2015 guidelines and replaced them with the 2016 guidelines and implemented final regulations. People in Interest of L.L. , 2017 COA 38, ¶ 15, 395 P.3d 1209 ; Indian Child Welfare Act Proceedings, 81 Fed. Reg. 38,778 (June 14, 2016) ; Bureau of Indian Affairs, Guidelines for Implementing the Indian Child Welfare Act (Dec. 2016), https://perma.cc/3TCH-8HQM (2016 Guidelines); see also Notice of Guidelines, 81 Fed. Reg. 96,476 (Dec. 30, 2016).

  3. In re K.G.

    488 P.3d 304 (Colo. App. 2017)   Cited 9 times

    Federal guidelines on ICWA are not binding, but they provide useful guidance in interpreting the statute. See People in Interest of L.L. , 2017 COA 38, ¶ 16, 395 P.3d 1209. ¶ 9

  4. People v. J.S.R. (In re I.B.-R.)

    439 P.3d 38 (Colo. App. 2018)   Cited 7 times

    The trial court must ask each participant on the record at the beginning of every emergency, voluntary, or involuntary child custody proceeding whether the participant knows or has reason to know that the child is an Indian child. 25 C.F.R. § 23.107(a); see also People in Interest of L.L. , 2017 COA 38, ¶ 19, 395 P.3d 1209. A proceeding to terminate parental rights is a separate child custody proceeding under ICWA.

  5. People ex rel. D.B.

    414 P.3d 46 (Colo. App. 2017)   Cited 7 times
    Recognizing that statutes enacted for the benefit of Indians, as well as regulations, guidelines, and state statutes promulgated for their implementation, must be liberally construed in favor of Indian interests

    ¶ 12 In order to protect Indian tribes and children, ICWA establishes minimal federal standards for child custody proceedings. 25 U.S.C. § 1902 (2012) ; see People in Interest of L.L. , 2017 COA 38, ¶ 12, 395 P.3d 1209. Such proceedings include any action that results in the termination of parental rights to an Indian child. 25 U.S.C. § 1903(1)(ii) (2012) ; B.H. v. People in Interest of X.H. , 138 P.3d 299, 302 (Colo.

  6. People ex rel. E.M.

    507 P.3d 113 (Colo. App. 2021)   Cited 6 times

    ¶ 7 If the court knows or has reason to know that an Indian child is involved in a child custody proceeding, including termination of parental rights, the petitioning party must provide notice to any identified Indian tribes. 25 U.S.C. § 1912(a) ; § 19-1-126(1)(b) ; see also People in Interest of L.L. , 2017 COA 38, ¶ 34, 395 P.3d 1209. To comply with ICWA's notice provisions, the Department must directly notify each tribe by registered mail with return receipt requested of the pending child custody proceeding and its right to intervene.

  7. People in Interest of S.B.

    459 P.3d 745 (Colo. App. 2020)   Cited 6 times

    The court must ask each participant on the record at the beginning of every emergency, voluntary, or involuntary child custody proceeding whether the participant knows or has reason to know that the child is an Indian child. 25 C.F.R. § 23.107(a) ; see People in Interest of L.L. , 2017 COA 38, ¶ 19, 395 P.3d 1209.

  8. People v. C.A.

    417 P.3d 909 (Colo. App. 2017)   Cited 5 times

    ¶ 8 ICWA establishes minimum federal standards to be followed when an Indian child is involved in a child custody proceeding. 25 U.S.C. §§ 1902, 1903(1), (4) (2012) ; People in Interest of L.L. , 2017 COA 38, ¶ 12, 395 P.3d 1209. "Of course, ICWA does not apply to every child-custody proceeding. Hence, in any such proceeding, the parties and juvenile court must ask two fundamental questions to determine whether ICWA applies to a case: (1) Does ICWA apply to the proceeding?

  9. People ex rel. A-J.A.B.

    511 P.3d 750 (Colo. App. 2022)   Cited 5 times
    Concluding that the juvenile court did not have "reason to know" the child was an Indian child where the court received information "that the child may have Cherokee and Sioux heritage" but mother stated she was not a member of either tribe and there was no basis to believe the child had membership or eligibility for membership in either tribe

    Bureau of Indian Affairs, Guidelines for Implementing the Indian Child Welfare Act (Dec. 2016), https://perma.cc/3TCH-8HQM (2016 Guidelines); see also People in Interest of L.L. , 2017 COA 38, ¶ 16, 395 P.3d 1209 (noting that, although the BIA's guidelines are not binding, we consider them persuasive). ¶ 18 The 2016 Guidelines explain the purpose of the Federal ICWA statute.

  10. In re L.H.

    431 P.3d 663 (Colo. App. 2018)   Cited 5 times

    In doing so, the Department must directly notify the tribe by registered or certified mail with return receipt requested of the pending child custody proceedings and its right to intervene. 25 C.F.R. § 23.111(a) (2017); see People in Interest of L.L. , 2017 COA 38, ¶¶ 34-35, 395 P.3d 1209. The notice must include: