From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lisiel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 20, 2010
72 A.D.3d 527 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2557.

April 20, 2010.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Bart Stone, J.), entered on or about November 3, 2005, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA) (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Adrienne M. Gantt of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alan Gadlin of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Tom, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Nardelli and Catterson, JJ.


The People met their burden of establishing, by clear and convincing evidence, risk factors bearing a sufficient total point score to support a level three adjudication. The court properly assessed 15 points under the factor for lack of supervised release ( see People v Lewis, 37 AD3d 689, 690, lv denied 8 NY3d 814), and there is no merit to defendant's argument that the SORA registration requirements themselves constitute a form of supervision. Since these points, when added to points that defendant does not contest, qualify him as a level three offender, we need not reach defendant's other claims. In any event, we find those claims unavailing.


Summaries of

People v. Lisiel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 20, 2010
72 A.D.3d 527 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

People v. Lisiel

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERTO LISIEL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 20, 2010

Citations

72 A.D.3d 527 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 3161
898 N.Y.S.2d 452