From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Linzy

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 28, 1976
357 N.E.2d 1021 (N.Y. 1976)

Opinion

Argued October 15, 1976

Decided October 28, 1976

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, DONALD H. MONROE, J.

Arlington R. Gleckner for appellant.

D. Bruce Crew, III, District Attorney (Richard L. Parker of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed. In view of uncontradicted assertions in the briefs concerning the granting of a severance only on condition of defendant waiving a jury trial, but absent support in the record, defendant's remedy is by motion to vacate the judgment under CPL 440.10 (subd 1, par [f]). In so holding the court, of course, expresses no view as to how such motion should be decided.

Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE.


Summaries of

People v. Linzy

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 28, 1976
357 N.E.2d 1021 (N.Y. 1976)
Case details for

People v. Linzy

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CLEMEN LINZY, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 28, 1976

Citations

357 N.E.2d 1021 (N.Y. 1976)
357 N.E.2d 1021
389 N.Y.S.2d 366