From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Liddell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 16, 1992
181 A.D.2d 795 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

March 16, 1992

Appeal from the County Court, Westchester County (Lange, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's arguments, the prosecutor did not withhold any information from the Grand Jury which would have materially influenced its investigation (see, People v Spinelli, 165 A.D.2d 888). Accordingly, the court did not err in denying the defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15).

The defendant's sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 85). We have considered the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Balletta, J.P., O'Brien, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Liddell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 16, 1992
181 A.D.2d 795 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Liddell

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RICHARD LIDDELL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 16, 1992

Citations

181 A.D.2d 795 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

People v. Gibson

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. We reject the defendant's contention that the indictment should be…

People v. Bower

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. We reject the defendant's contention that the indictment should be…