From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lewis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 2, 1997
243 A.D.2d 256 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Summary

In Lewis, the court held that the police properly secured the defendant's clothing which was "blood-soaked... since the clothing constituted evidence of the stabbing incident... and "was the result of a proper inventory search.

Summary of this case from People v. Hill

Opinion

October 2, 1997

Appeal from Supreme Court, New York County (Rena Uviller, J.).


Defendant's motion to suppress identification testimony was properly denied. The showup was justified by its close temporal and spatial proximity to the crime and the desirability of obtaining a prompt and reliable identification ( People v. Duuvon, 77 N.Y.2d 541). Moreover, the showup was also rendered eminently reasonable by the unusual circumstance that the complainant and defendant were both lying on gurneys in different parts of the same emergency room being treated for the serious injuries they had just inflicted upon each other in the incident ( see, People v Whitney, 158 A.D.2d 734). Under the totality of the circumstances, the showup procedure was not unduly suggestive ( People v Rodriguez, 64 N.Y.2d 738).

Defendant's motion to suppress physical evidence was properly denied. The police officers properly secured defendant's blood-soaked clothing, which had been removed by medical personnel, since the clothing constituted evidence of the stabbing incident. The officers' recovery of a razor blade from the clothing was the result of a proper inventory search which created a "usable inventory" ( People v. Galak, 80 N.Y.2d 715, 720).

The challenged portion of the People's summation was based upon the evidence and responsive to defense argument, and did not suggest uncharged crimes. In any event, the court's detailed curative instruction prevented any possibility of prejudice.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Williams, Tom and Colabella, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Lewis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 2, 1997
243 A.D.2d 256 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

In Lewis, the court held that the police properly secured the defendant's clothing which was "blood-soaked... since the clothing constituted evidence of the stabbing incident... and "was the result of a proper inventory search.

Summary of this case from People v. Hill
Case details for

People v. Lewis

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ERIC LEWIS, Also Known…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 2, 1997

Citations

243 A.D.2d 256 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
663 N.Y.S.2d 9

Citing Cases

People v. Grant

Moreover, blood was found inside the Nissan Maxima, and a sample of the defendant's DNA matched that blood.…

People v. Sanders

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of his omnibus motion…