From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 10, 2009
64 A.D.3d 1236 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. KA 06-01912.

July 10, 2009.

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Alex R. Renzi, J.), rendered April 19, 2006. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (DREW R. DUBRIN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MICHAEL C. GREEN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (KELLY CHRISTINE WOLFORD OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Present: Scudder, P.J., Hurlbutt, Martoche, Smith and Centra, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by vacating the sentence and as modified the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to Monroe County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (Penal Law § 265.02). Inasmuch as defendant was sentenced as a second felony offender, the People correctly concede that the sentence is illegal insofar as County Court ordered the sentence to run concurrently with a prior undischarged sentence ( see § 70.25 [former (2-a)]; People ex rel. Gill v Greene, 12 NY3d 1, 6; People v Ingoglia, 305 AD2d 1002, 1003, lv denied 100 NY2d 583). The People contend, however, that defendant is receiving the benefit of his plea bargain because the Department of Correctional Services has not corrected the error, and defendant therefore should not be permitted to challenge the legality of the sentence. We reject that contention, in view of the well settled principle that "`we cannot allow an [illegal] sentence to stand'" ( People v Davis, 37 AD3d 1179, 1180, lv denied 8 NY3d 983). Thus, we modify the judgment by vacating the sentence, and we remit the matter to County Court to afford defendant the opportunity to withdraw his plea or to be resentenced as a second felony offender in compliance with Penal Law § 70.25 (former [2-a]) ( see People v Ciccarelli, 32 AD3d 1175; Ingoglia, 305 AD2d at 1003).


Summaries of

People v. Lee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 10, 2009
64 A.D.3d 1236 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

People v. Lee

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PAUL LEE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 10, 2009

Citations

64 A.D.3d 1236 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 5821
881 N.Y.S.2d 355

Citing Cases

People v. Seymour

As the People correctly concede, that sentence is illegal because the minimum period of PRS that could be…

People v. Phelps

offense run concurrently with a determinate sentence of imprisonment of three years imposed on a prior…