From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Leal

Supreme Court of California. En Banc.
Apr 23, 2003
133 Cal. Rptr. 2d 321 (Cal. 2003)

Opinion

No. S114399.

04-23-2003

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Juan Diego LEAL, Defendant and Appellant.

Petition for Review GRANTED.


Petition for Review GRANTED.

The issue to be briefed and argued is limited to the following: Does the element of "duress" for the purposes of forcible sexual offenses other than rape and spousal rape include within its definition the concept of "hardship" that was deleted from the definition of "duress" for forcible rape and spousal rape (Stats.1993, ch. 595 § 1), or does the deletion of "hardship" from the definition of "duress" in those statues apply to the meaning of "duress" for all forcible sexual offenses?

This issue also is pending before the court in People v. Edmonton, S112168 (# 03-13).

GEORGE, C.J. and KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, BROWN and MORENO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Leal

Supreme Court of California. En Banc.
Apr 23, 2003
133 Cal. Rptr. 2d 321 (Cal. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Leal

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Juan Diego LEAL, Defendant and…

Court:Supreme Court of California. En Banc.

Date published: Apr 23, 2003

Citations

133 Cal. Rptr. 2d 321 (Cal. 2003)
67 P.3d 645