From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Leabo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 31, 2003
2 A.D.3d 1213 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

14161.

Decided and Entered: December 31, 2003.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Franklin County (Main Jr., J.), rendered February 25, 2002, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree.

Salvatore C. Adamo, Albany, for appellant.

Derek P. Champagne, District Attorney, Malone (Andrew G. Schrader of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Crew III, J.P., Mugglin, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


A grand jury indicted defendant on the crimes of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, both class B felonies. Pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement, defendant pleaded guilty to the reduced crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, a class D felony, in satisfaction of the indictment, two pending violation of probation petitions, and any potential narcotics charges arising from incidents which occurred in the periods three months before and after the date of the allegations in the indictment. No sentence was recommended. The plea included a waiver of the right to appeal, except as to the sentence. County Court sentenced defendant to a term of 2 to 6 years' incarceration.

Defendant's arguments concerning the voluntariness of his plea and ineffectiveness of counsel are not preserved for our review because he did not move to withdraw his plea or vacate the judgment of conviction (see People v. Camp, 302 A.D.2d 629, 630, lv denied 100 N.Y.2d 593; People v. King, 299 A.D.2d 661, lv denied 99 N.Y.2d 583). His sentence is not harsh or excessive. It is moderate considering defendant's criminal history, his exposure to two concurrent terms of 8 to 25 years on the original charges, plus the dismissal of the probation violation petitions and waiver of other potential charges (see People v. Sczepankowski, 293 A.D.2d 212, 215-216, lv denied 99 N.Y.2d 564).

Crew III, J.P., Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Leabo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 31, 2003
2 A.D.3d 1213 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Leabo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CRAIG A. LEABO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 31, 2003

Citations

2 A.D.3d 1213 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
768 N.Y.S.2d 849

Citing Cases

People v. Leabo

June 22, 2004. Appeal from the 3d Dept: 2 AD3d 1213 (Franklin). Application in criminal case for leave to…

People v. Kemp

We affirm. By failing to make the appropriate motion before County Court ( see CPL 220.60; 440.10), defendant…