Opinion
February 14, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hall, J.).
Ordered that the judgment and amended judgment are affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the People failed to adduce legally sufficient evidence under Indictment No. 8975/91 establishing that he had knowledge of the weight of the controlled substance beyond a reasonable doubt is unpreserved for appellate review and we decline to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see, People v. Bright, 210 A.D.2d 244).
The defendant's remaining contentions are either without merit or do not warrant reversal. Ritter, J.P., Pizzuto, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.