From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lavayen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 26, 1993
195 A.D.2d 609 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

July 26, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the prosecution failed to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt of the offense of depraved mind murder (see, Penal Law § 125.25). Viewing the circumstantial evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, and giving it the benefit of every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom, we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The facts from which the inference of guilt is drawn, when perceived as a whole, are inconsistent with the defendant's innocence and exclude to a moral certainty every reasonable hypothesis other than guilt (see, People v. Lewis, 64 N.Y.2d 1111; People v. Benzinger, 36 N.Y.2d 29; cf., People v. Giuliano, 65 N.Y.2d 766). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15).

The defendant's contentions with respect to the propriety of certain comments made by the prosecutor are unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Oliver, 63 N.Y.2d 973, 975). In any event, the comments in question constituted reasonable conclusions fairly drawn from the testimony and ballistics evidence adduced at trial (see, People v. Ashwal, 39 N.Y.2d 105, 109-110).

There is no support in the record for the defendant's contention, set forth in his supplemental pro se brief, that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel due to the defense counsel's failure to interview and call two potential eyewitnesses (see, People v. Nieves, 144 A.D.2d 588, 589; People v. Leonard, 102 A.D.2d 857). Moreover, viewing the entirety of the defense counsel's efforts on the defendant's behalf, we find that the defendant received "meaningful representation" (see, People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 147; People v. Gatto, 146 A.D.2d 643, 644; People v. Obair, 138 A.D.2d 750, 751). Bracken, J.P., Balletta, Lawrence and Copertino, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Lavayen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 26, 1993
195 A.D.2d 609 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Lavayen

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MARCO LAVAYEN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 26, 1993

Citations

195 A.D.2d 609 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
602 N.Y.S.2d 548

Citing Cases

People v. Toney

05; People v. Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19; People v. Gonzalez, 183 AD2d 725, 726; People v. Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245).…

People v. Dorsey

05; People v. Cannon, 224 A.D.2d 439). In any event, viewing the circumstantial evidence in the light most…