From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Laurange

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jul 19, 2012
97 A.D.3d 995 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-07-19

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John P. LAURANGE, Appellant.

Greg D. Lubow, Tannersville, for appellant. Paul Czajka, District Attorney, Hudson (H. Neal Conolly of counsel), for respondent.


Greg D. Lubow, Tannersville, for appellant. Paul Czajka, District Attorney, Hudson (H. Neal Conolly of counsel), for respondent.
Before: MERCURE, J.P., ROSE, KAVANAGH, McCARTHY and EGAN JR., JJ.

KAVANAGH, J.

Appeal from an order of the County Court of Columbia County (Czajka, J.), dated December 1, 2010, which classified defendant as a risk level III sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

In 2008, defendant pleaded guilty to, among other things, criminal sexual act in the third degree and rape in the third degree and was sentenced to an aggregate prison term of four years. In anticipation of his release from prison, the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders prepared a risk assessment instrument in accordance with the Sex Offender Registration Act ( see Correction Law art 6–C) in which defendant was presumptively classified as a risk level III sex offender. At a subsequent appearance before County Court with counsel, defendant was adjudicated a risk level III sex offender. Defendant now appeals.

The order that defendant seeks to review has not been “entered and filed in the office of the clerk of the court” (CPLR 2220[a] ) and, therefore, the appeal from that order must be dismissed because it is not properly before us at this time ( seeCPLR 5513, 5515[1]; Abele Tractor & Equip. Co., Inc. v. RJ Valente, Inc., 79 A.D.3d 1331, 1332, 915 N.Y.S.2d 178 [2010] ). In that regard, defendant's counsel advised this Court that the Columbia County Clerk's office has refused to enter the order because more than one year has passed since it was signed. No time limit exists in the CPLR for having such an order entered by the County Clerk's Office ( seeCPLR 2220[a]; Connors, Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons Laws of N.Y., Book 7B, CPLR C2220:1, at 241).

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.

MERCURE, J.P., ROSE, McCARTHY and EGAN JR., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Laurange

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jul 19, 2012
97 A.D.3d 995 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Laurange

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John P. LAURANGE…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Jul 19, 2012

Citations

97 A.D.3d 995 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 5682
948 N.Y.S.2d 567

Citing Cases

People v. Lane

On the other hand, "the daily business of litigation is conducted ... through other 'clerk' offices," such as…

People v. Lane

On the other hand, "the daily business of litigation is conducted ... through other ‘clerk’ offices," such as…