From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Latimer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 30, 1991
176 A.D.2d 350 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

September 30, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Douglass, J.).


Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We disagree with the defendant's assertion that the trial court erred in denying his application to withdraw his guilty pleas based upon his claims of coercion and innocence, which were made at the time of sentencing. The determination of whether to allow a defendant to withdraw a guilty plea rests within the sound discretion of the trial court and should not be disturbed unless there is a clear abuse of that discretion (see, CPL 220.60; 380.30 [3]; People v. Howard, 138 A.D.2d 525; People v. Melendez, 135 A.D.2d 660; People v. Stubbs, 110 A.D.2d 725). The record establishes that the defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily entered his plea. The court ensured that a sufficient factual basis for the defendant's guilty pleas was established by having the defendant admit in his own words that on three occasions between June 26, 1985, and July 23, 1985, he sold narcotics to an undercover police officer, and that on March 21, 1986, he possessed more than an eighth of an ounce of cocaine with the intent to sell it. These admissions were unaccompanied by any protests of innocence. Moreover, the defendant's mere unsubstantiated claims of coercion and his protestations of innocence at sentencing were not sufficient to render the pleas procedurally or substantively defective (see, People v Billingsley, 54 N.Y.2d 960, 961; People v. Barnett, 136 A.D.2d 555; People v. Morris, 118 A.D.2d 595, 596; People v. Stubbs, supra). Accordingly, the court's denial of the defendant's request to vacate his pleas was proper (see, People v. Brown, 126 A.D.2d 898, 899-900).

We have considered the defendant's remaining contention and find it to be without merit (see, People v. Kelsch, 96 A.D.2d 677, 678). Bracken, J.P., Kooper, Lawrence, Balletta and O'Brien, JJ. concur.


Summaries of

People v. Latimer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 30, 1991
176 A.D.2d 350 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Latimer

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LESLIE LATIMER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 30, 1991

Citations

176 A.D.2d 350 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
574 N.Y.S.2d 586

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

The defendant's protestations at sentencing that he was coerced into pleading guilty and did not understand…

People v. Scialphi

The defendant knowingly and voluntarily pleaded guilty in the presence of competent counsel after the court…