From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lamb

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 14, 1992
186 A.D.2d 151 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

September 14, 1992

Appeal from the County Court, Suffolk County (Vaughn, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contentions regarding his plea and sentencing are unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636; see also, People v Claudio, 64 N.Y.2d 858, 859). In any event, the plea of guilty was properly accepted (see, People v Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9) and further inquiry into the plea proceedings is unwarranted (People v Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 666). Furthermore, since as the defendant received the promised sentence, his sentencing claim is baseless (see, People v Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816, 817), and his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing is also without merit. Bracken, J.P., Sullivan, Harwood, Rosenblatt and Copertino, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Lamb

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 14, 1992
186 A.D.2d 151 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Lamb

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WARREN LAMB, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 14, 1992

Citations

186 A.D.2d 151 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
587 N.Y.S.2d 712