From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lagarenne

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 8, 2017
148 A.D.3d 826 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

03-08-2017

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. William M. LAGARENNE, appellant.

Steven A. Feldman, Uniondale, NY, for appellant. Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Grazia DiVincenzo of counsel), for respondent.


Steven A. Feldman, Uniondale, NY, for appellant.

Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Grazia DiVincenzo of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Efman, J.), rendered April 17, 2015, convicting him of attempted burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v. Sanders, 25 N.Y.3d 337, 341–342, 12 N.Y.S.3d 593, 34 N.E.3d 344 ; People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 256–257, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 ). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his challenge to the factual sufficiency of his plea allocution (see People v. Carle, 121 A.D.3d 1011, 993 N.Y.S.2d 918 ; People v. Devodier, 102 A.D.3d 884, 958 N.Y.S.2d 220 ; People v. Crews, 92 A.D.3d 795, 795–796, 938 N.Y.S.2d 475 ).

DILLON, J.P., CHAMBERS, SGROI, MALTESE and BARROS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Lagarenne

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 8, 2017
148 A.D.3d 826 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Lagarenne

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. William M. LAGARENNE, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 8, 2017

Citations

148 A.D.3d 826 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
47 N.Y.S.3d 909

Citing Cases

People v. Lisi

The defendant's waiver of his right to appeal was valid (see People v Bryant, 28 NY3d 1094; People v Lopez, 6…

People v. Jackson

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.The defendant's valid waiver of her right to appeal precludes review of…