From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Krauseneck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jul 10, 2020
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 68675 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

KA 20-00372 Indictment No: 2019-705

07-10-2020

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. JAMES KRAUSENECK, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


PRESENT:

Defendant having moved pursuant to CPL 230.20 for a change of venue from Supreme Court, Monroe County, for the prosecution of indictment number 2019-705,

Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to the motion, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is hereby ORDERED that the motion is denied.

Memorandum: We conclude that defendant has not met his burden of demonstrating that there is "reasonable cause to believe that a fair and impartial trial cannot be had" in Onondaga County (CPL 230.20[2]). If it develops during the voir dire that a fair and impartial jury cannot be drawn, an appropriate motion may then be made. The relief requested in the motion is premature (People v Mateo, 239 AD2d 965 [4th Dept 1997]).

Entered: July 10, 2020

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court


Summaries of

People v. Krauseneck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jul 10, 2020
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 68675 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

People v. Krauseneck

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. JAMES KRAUSENECK, JR.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 10, 2020

Citations

2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 68675 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)