From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. King

Michigan Court of Appeals
Nov 30, 1971
194 N.W.2d 454 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)

Opinion

Docket No. 9053.

Decided November 30, 1971.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, William L. Cahalan, Prosecuting Attorney, Dominick R. Carnovale, Chief, Appellate Department, and Carolyn Florescu, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.

Charles Campbell, for defendant on appeal.

Before: LEVIN, P.J., and QUINN and V.J. BRENNAN, JJ.


Defendant raises two issues for appellate review: (1) alleged improper cross-examination of a res gestae witness by the prosecutor, and (2) alleged improper cross-examination of defendant by the prosecutor. Neither of these alleged errors was preserved by objection at trial. We have, nevertheless, considered them and concluded that the defendant is not entitled to a new trial.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. King

Michigan Court of Appeals
Nov 30, 1971
194 N.W.2d 454 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)
Case details for

People v. King

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. LARRY KING

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Nov 30, 1971

Citations

194 N.W.2d 454 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)
37 Mich. App. 294