From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. King

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 16, 2015
134 A.D.3d 958 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

2012-05220 Ind. No. 2515/10.

12-16-2015

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Jamir KING, appellant.

Jamir King, Pine City, N.Y., appellant pro se. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Merri Turk Lasky, and Mariana Zelig of counsel), for respondent. Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Jenin Younes of counsel), former appellate counsel.


Jamir King, Pine City, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Merri Turk Lasky, and Mariana Zelig of counsel), for respondent.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Jenin Younes of counsel), former appellate counsel.

Opinion

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated July 16, 2014 (People v. King, 119 A.D.3d 819, 989 N.Y.S.2d 315), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered May 10, 2012.

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 103 S.Ct. 3308, 77 L.Ed.2d 987; People v. Stultz, 2 N.Y.3d 277, 778 N.Y.S.2d 431, 810 N.E.2d 883).

DILLON, J.P., AUSTIN, COHEN and BARROS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. King

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 16, 2015
134 A.D.3d 958 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

People v. King

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Jamir KING, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 16, 2015

Citations

134 A.D.3d 958 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 9302
20 N.Y.S.3d 539

Citing Cases

King v. Capra

On December 26, 2015, the Appellate Division denied this writ as well. People v. King, 134 A.D.3d 958, 20…