From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Kane

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 23, 1984
100 A.D.2d 944 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

April 23, 1984


Appeal by defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Lamont, J.), imposed July 15, 1982, upon his conviction of burglary in the third degree, insofar as it denied his application for youthful offender treatment. ¶ Sentence affirmed, insofar as appealed from. ¶ Since defendant had been previously adjudicated a youthful offender following his conviction of a felony, he was ineligible for youthful offender treatment following his subsequent conviction of the instant crime of burglary in the third degree (see CPL 720.10, subd 2, par [c]; People v Green, 75 A.D.2d 625). In any event, even if defendant was eligible, his record and background would support the denial of youthful offender treatment. Mollen, P.J., Titone, Lazer and Mangano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Kane

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 23, 1984
100 A.D.2d 944 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

People v. Kane

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SCOTT KANE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 23, 1984

Citations

100 A.D.2d 944 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

People v. Storts

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. The County Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the…

People v. Sanchez

Further, there was no abuse of discretion in the court's denial of the defendant's motion, which was opposed…