From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Kaczynski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 17, 1986
119 A.D.2d 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

April 17, 1986


Motion for extension of time to take appeal, pursuant to CPL 460.30, denied on the ground that the papers fail to contain sworn allegations of facts claimed to establish the improper conduct, inability to communicate, or other facts essential to support the motion (see, CPL 460.30). In our view, it is necessary that a defendant specify the facts claimed to establish the grounds for relief pursuant to CPL 460.30. On the present motion, defendant simply sets forth general allegations which are insufficient to establish his right to an extension of time to take an appeal pursuant to CPL 460.30. Kane, J.P., Main, Casey, Weiss and Mikoll, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Kaczynski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 17, 1986
119 A.D.2d 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

People v. Kaczynski

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD KACZYNSKI…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 17, 1986

Citations

119 A.D.2d 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Greiner

See CPL § 460.10(4) (to appeal the denial of a § 440.10 motion, a defendant must apply for leave to appeal…

Thomas v. Greiner

See CPL § 460.10(4) (to appeal the denial of a § 440.10 motion, a defendant must apply for leave to appeal…