From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Juliano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 8, 1994
207 A.D.2d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

August 8, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kreindler, J.).


Ordered that the sentences are reversed, on the law, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.

In 1979 the defendant was convicted of a felony and sentenced, on March 15, 1979, as a second felony offender. After an unsuccessful appeal to this Court, the defendant moved to vacate his plea and sentence on the ground that he was improperly adjudicated a second felony offender. Upon a finding that a Federal felony conviction employed by the People as a predicate was not equivalent to a State felony, the Supreme Court vacated the sentence previously imposed, but not the plea of guilty, and the defendant was resentenced on December 15, 1980.

The offenses of which the defendant now stands convicted were each committed in 1990, the latest having been committed in October thereof. Prior to pleading guilty the defendant moved for a determination that his prior felony conviction could not be used as a predicate for the purpose of adjudicating him a second felony offender, because sentence was imposed thereon in March 1979, more than 10 years prior to the commission of the instant offenses (see, Penal Law § 70.06 [b] [iv]). The Supreme Court agreed, rejecting the People's contention that sentence on the prior conviction was actually imposed on December 15, 1980, the date of resentence. The People appeal from the sentences imposed on Indictment Nos. 464/91 and 4978/91 on the basis that the sentencing court erred in refusing to adjudicate the defendant a second felony offender. We agree.

Pursuant to Penal Law § 70.06 (1) (b) (iv), in order for a prior conviction to be used as a predicate felony conviction for the purpose of a second felony adjudication, "sentence must have been imposed not more than ten years before commission of the felony of which the defendant presently stands convicted." Here, while the defendant's prior felony conviction was not altered after March 15, 1979, the sentence imposed thereon, which is a component of the judgment of conviction (see, CPL 1.20), was vacated subsequent to that date. The "sentence", as that word is used in section 70.06 (1) (b) (iv) is the sentence imposed as part of the final judgment on December 15, 1980 (see, People v Bell, 138 A.D.2d 298, 300 [Sullivan, J., dissenting], mod on dissenting opn 73 N.Y.2d 153, 165; see also, People v. Lewis, 143 Misc.2d 752, mod on other grounds 175 A.D.2d 885). Therefore, the defendant should have been adjudicated a second felony offender. Accordingly, sentences are vacated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, so that the defendant may be resentenced in accordance with the terms of the plea agreement. Lawrence, J.P., O'Brien, Copertino and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Juliano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 8, 1994
207 A.D.2d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Juliano

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. RICHARD JULIANO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 8, 1994

Citations

207 A.D.2d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
615 N.Y.S.2d 460

Citing Cases

People v. Thomas

idivist sentencing statutes. Indeed, the Appellate Division has generally arrived at the opposite conclusion…

People v. Thomas

Indeed, the Appellate Division has generally arrived at the opposite conclusion of the majority here, and…