From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Judd

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 18, 2006
29 A.D.3d 431 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

8557.

May 18, 2006.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ruth Levine Sussman, J.), entered on or about April 12, 2005, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Laura R. Johnson, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Laura Lieberman Cohen of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Nicole Beder of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Tom, J.P., Saxe, Nardelli, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ., concur.


The record supports the court's independent finding, following a recommendation by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, that defendant should be designated a level three sex offender, based on his prior felony sex crime conviction, which is a presumptive overriding factor under the Board's guidelines ( see People v. Scott, 288 AD2d 763). Defendant's 1985 and 1992 felony convictions both involved sex crimes against children. The danger of future recidivism evinced by this past recidivism outweighs the various mitigating factors argued by defendant, such as the absence of recent criminal activity, and the court properly concluded that defendant's present circumstances did not warrant a downward departure from his presumptive risk level ( see People v. Guaman, 8 AD3d 545).


Summaries of

People v. Judd

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 18, 2006
29 A.D.3d 431 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

People v. Judd

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MARTIN JUDD, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 18, 2006

Citations

29 A.D.3d 431 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 3986
814 N.Y.S.2d 165

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

The record supports the level three sex offender adjudication. Defendant is subject to the presumptive…

People v. Rosario

The record supports the level three sex offender adjudication. Defendant is subject to the presumptive…