From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Juarbe

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jun 15, 2018
162 A.D.3d 1625 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

573 KA 16–01087

06-15-2018

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jose JUARBE, Defendant–appellant.

FRANK J. NEBUSH, JR., PUBLIC DEFENDER, UTICA (DAVID A. COOKE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–APPELLANT. SCOTT D. MCNAMARA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, UTICA (STEVEN G. COX OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.


FRANK J. NEBUSH, JR., PUBLIC DEFENDER, UTICA (DAVID A. COOKE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–APPELLANT.

SCOTT D. MCNAMARA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, UTICA (STEVEN G. COX OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., DEJOSEPH, CURRAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of assault in the second degree ( Penal Law § 120.05[3] ), defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal was not valid, and that his plea was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent. Regardless of whether defendant's waiver of the right to appeal is valid, it does not preclude our review of his challenge to the validity of the plea because defendant's contention implicates the voluntariness of the plea (see People v. Copes, 145 A.D.3d 1639, 1639, 44 N.Y.S.3d 833 [4th Dept. 2016], lv denied 28 N.Y.3d 1182, 52 N.Y.S.3d 709, 75 N.E.3d 101 [2017] ). We further conclude that defendant's challenge to the voluntariness of his plea is not preserved for our review inasmuch as he did not move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction (see People v. Rosado, 70 A.D.3d 1315, 1315–1316, 894 N.Y.S.2d 703 [4th Dept. 2010], lv denied 14 N.Y.3d 892, 903 N.Y.S.2d 780, 929 N.E.2d 1015 [2010] ). In any event, defendant's contention lacks merit. "Although it is well settled that ‘[a] defendant may not be induced to plead guilty by the threat of a heavier sentence if he [or she] decides to proceed to trial’ ..., the statements of the court at issue ... ‘amount to a description of the range of the potential sentences’ rather than impermissible coercion ... ‘The fact that defendant may have pleaded guilty to avoid receiving a harsher sentence does not render his plea coerced’ " ( People v. Boyde, 71 A.D.3d 1442, 1443, 897 N.Y.S.2d 570 [4th Dept. 2010], lv denied 15 N.Y.3d 747, 906 N.Y.S.2d 820, 933 N.E.2d 219 [2010] ; see People v. Obbagy, 147 A.D.3d 1296, 1297, 48 N.Y.S.3d 558 [4th Dept. 2017], lv denied 29 N.Y.3d 1035, 62 N.Y.S.3d 304, 84 N.E.3d 976 [2017] ).


Summaries of

People v. Juarbe

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jun 15, 2018
162 A.D.3d 1625 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

People v. Juarbe

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jose JUARBE…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 15, 2018

Citations

162 A.D.3d 1625 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
162 A.D.3d 1625

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

The court's statement requiring defendant to accept or reject the plea offer within a short time period "does…

People v. Williams

The court's statement requiring defendant to accept or reject the plea offer within a short time period "does…